Corporate cash does funny things to people. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) got into office by pledging to fight "special interests," but just a decade or so later, he's running one of the biggest special interest shows in Washington. It's easy to see the appeal. As the fancy funding backing the Tea Party demonstrates, big money buys big things—from elections to populist outrage.
In a piece for Mother Jones, Kate Sheppard details some of DeMint's serious campaign finance flip-floppery. During his first bid for Congress in 1998, DeMint denounced the Political Action Committee (PAC) mechanism as a tool deployed by "special interests" that "corrupts" the electoral process. But today, DeMint is the single most important figure and fundraiser for Senate Tea Party races. He has endorsed and pledged millions of dollars to support fringe right-wingers Senate candidates Christine O'Donnell (Delaware) and Rand Paul (Kentucky). DeMint has funneled this money through his own Political Action Committee (PAC) known as the Senate Conservatives Fund. DeMint even pledged to "fight for reforms that allow only individual contributions to campaigns."
But as I note in a blog for Campaign for America's Future, DeMint isn't the only power player pouring money into the Tea Party. DeMint's 12 Tea Party Senate candidates have reaped over $4.6 million from Wall Street for this election—excluding Wall Street cash that has been funneled through DeMint's PAC. So much for all that grassroots rage against bailed-out elites.
The Tea Party bubble
And Wall Street's new Tea Party investment might just be the next big economic bubble. Joshua Holland at AlterNet surveys the campaign contributions of America's bailout barons. The 23 firms that received at least $1 billion in bailout money from taxpayers spent $1.4 million on campaign contributions—in September alone.
And these are just campaign contributions, which are essentially unaffected by the high court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The real corporate money is running through front-groups that run their own ads—not the official campaigns operated by political candidates. And these front-groups don't have to disclose where their money comes from.
Writing for Campus Progress, Simeon Tally highlights a frightening trend toward secrecy in U.S. elections, fueled by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. Back in 2004, 98 percent of outside groups disclosed who their donors were. Today, that number is just 32 percent. We're not just fighting corporate money bombs, we're fighting secret corporate money bombs.
Who really has the advantage?
While there's been much debate over who really comes out on top thanks to the post-Citizens United rules, Jesse Zwick notes for The Washington Independent, these stories are only talking about direct campaign contributions. Some might argue that Democrats have an advantage in disclosed funding, but Republicans have a six-to-one advantage money flowing through outside groups.
But wait, there's more!
- Check out Matthew Reichbach and Trip Jennings' reporting for The New Mexico Independent on the fact that all of this spending from outside groups usually means money from outside the states where candidates are running. Outside expenditures have swelled to $5 million in two New Mexico House races—both in relatively cheap media markets.
- AlterNet has been running loads of stories on crooked corporate cash, covering everything from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's dirty dealings with AIG to the political spending habits of bailed-out banks. Joshua Holland rounds up eight of the articles here for AlterNet.
- Comic artist Matt Bors makes light of America's new "growth industries" at Campus Progress, pointing to makers of anonymous political attack ads.
In 2001, Ben Bernanke earned the nickname Helicopter Ben, after a talk he gave at the National Economists Club. The title of the talk was “Deflation: Making Sure ‘It’ Doesn't Happen Here,” a reference to the spiral of disinflation, leading to economic stagnation, leading to outright deflation, that gripped Japan for over a decade after the collapse of its real estate and stock bubbles.
Bernanke, then a Federal Reserve governor – now its chairman – argued that this spiral of economic destruction could be prevented in the United States:
Virtually all economists agree that disinflation and deflation are caused by a shortage of dollars in the economy. The majority agree that such deflation is accompanied by a rise in unemployment. If inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods, then deflation is too few dollars chasing too few goods. As a side effect some of those goods are never caught. No one buys them, their producers lay off workers and unemployment rises.The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.
But, Bernake said, we need not let it happen here. The problem is – we are.
The economy is contracting, inflation is falling, wages are stagnant and we are dangerously close to outright deflation. The spiral has come home to America.
Intimidated by inflation hawks, however, Ben Bernanke said, “I have rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy.”
That’s true Fed speak, so let me see if I can parse it out for you.
The economy is being dragged down by the spiral of ever lower inflation. As banks and businesses see inflation fall, it only increases their incentive to sit on the cash they have. As I mentioned before, if we reach outright deflation then they can earn a profit simply by stockpiling money in vault. Every year as prices fall the money locked in that vault would become more and more valuable.
However, money locked in a vault does nothing to support economic growth. It does not fund new investments, new workers or new products. Without that base of new investment or new spending, prices fall further, goods are discounted more deeply and the deflation spiral worsens.
We could power out of such a spiral by raising inflation expectations. The Fed could promise that any decline in prices today would be met by an equal rise in prices tomorrow. Any business considering sitting on its cash would know that know that this is a losing proposition. What it gains by taking advantage of disinflation today, it will lose when exposed to re-inflation tomorrow.
Making this plan work, however, requires that the Fed be willing to produce catch-up inflation -- a short period in which inflation would be higher than normal, so as to make up for the current period were inflation is lower than normal.
At a talk this weekend, Bernanke, however, "rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy."
That is, he has rejected the idea of catch up inflation. He has rejected using the Fed to power out of the spiral. He has decided to let it happen here.
We can only hope that time will bring back the Bernanke of yore.
Karl Smith is an assistant professor of economics and government at the University of North Carolina and a blogger at ModeledBehavior.com.
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
Corporate cash does funny things to people. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) got into office by pledging to fight "special interests," but just a decade or so later, he's running one of the biggest special interest shows in Washington. It's easy to see the appeal. As the fancy funding backing the Tea Party demonstrates, big money buys big things—from elections to populist outrage.
In a piece for Mother Jones, Kate Sheppard details some of DeMint's serious campaign finance flip-floppery. During his first bid for Congress in 1998, DeMint denounced the Political Action Committee (PAC) mechanism as a tool deployed by "special interests" that "corrupts" the electoral process. But today, DeMint is the single most important figure and fundraiser for Senate Tea Party races. He has endorsed and pledged millions of dollars to support fringe right-wingers Senate candidates Christine O'Donnell (Delaware) and Rand Paul (Kentucky). DeMint has funneled this money through his own Political Action Committee (PAC) known as the Senate Conservatives Fund. DeMint even pledged to "fight for reforms that allow only individual contributions to campaigns."
But as I note in a blog for Campaign for America's Future, DeMint isn't the only power player pouring money into the Tea Party. DeMint's 12 Tea Party Senate candidates have reaped over $4.6 million from Wall Street for this election—excluding Wall Street cash that has been funneled through DeMint's PAC. So much for all that grassroots rage against bailed-out elites.
The Tea Party bubble
And Wall Street's new Tea Party investment might just be the next big economic bubble. Joshua Holland at AlterNet surveys the campaign contributions of America's bailout barons. The 23 firms that received at least $1 billion in bailout money from taxpayers spent $1.4 million on campaign contributions—in September alone.
And these are just campaign contributions, which are essentially unaffected by the high court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The real corporate money is running through front-groups that run their own ads—not the official campaigns operated by political candidates. And these front-groups don't have to disclose where their money comes from.
Writing for Campus Progress, Simeon Tally highlights a frightening trend toward secrecy in U.S. elections, fueled by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. Back in 2004, 98 percent of outside groups disclosed who their donors were. Today, that number is just 32 percent. We're not just fighting corporate money bombs, we're fighting secret corporate money bombs.
Who really has the advantage?
While there's been much debate over who really comes out on top thanks to the post-Citizens United rules, Jesse Zwick notes for The Washington Independent, these stories are only talking about direct campaign contributions. Some might argue that Democrats have an advantage in disclosed funding, but Republicans have a six-to-one advantage money flowing through outside groups.
But wait, there's more!
- Check out Matthew Reichbach and Trip Jennings' reporting for The New Mexico Independent on the fact that all of this spending from outside groups usually means money from outside the states where candidates are running. Outside expenditures have swelled to $5 million in two New Mexico House races—both in relatively cheap media markets.
- AlterNet has been running loads of stories on crooked corporate cash, covering everything from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's dirty dealings with AIG to the political spending habits of bailed-out banks. Joshua Holland rounds up eight of the articles here for AlterNet.
- Comic artist Matt Bors makes light of America's new "growth industries" at Campus Progress, pointing to makers of anonymous political attack ads.
In 2001, Ben Bernanke earned the nickname Helicopter Ben, after a talk he gave at the National Economists Club. The title of the talk was “Deflation: Making Sure ‘It’ Doesn't Happen Here,” a reference to the spiral of disinflation, leading to economic stagnation, leading to outright deflation, that gripped Japan for over a decade after the collapse of its real estate and stock bubbles.
Bernanke, then a Federal Reserve governor – now its chairman – argued that this spiral of economic destruction could be prevented in the United States:
Virtually all economists agree that disinflation and deflation are caused by a shortage of dollars in the economy. The majority agree that such deflation is accompanied by a rise in unemployment. If inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods, then deflation is too few dollars chasing too few goods. As a side effect some of those goods are never caught. No one buys them, their producers lay off workers and unemployment rises.The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.
But, Bernake said, we need not let it happen here. The problem is – we are.
The economy is contracting, inflation is falling, wages are stagnant and we are dangerously close to outright deflation. The spiral has come home to America.
Intimidated by inflation hawks, however, Ben Bernanke said, “I have rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy.”
That’s true Fed speak, so let me see if I can parse it out for you.
The economy is being dragged down by the spiral of ever lower inflation. As banks and businesses see inflation fall, it only increases their incentive to sit on the cash they have. As I mentioned before, if we reach outright deflation then they can earn a profit simply by stockpiling money in vault. Every year as prices fall the money locked in that vault would become more and more valuable.
However, money locked in a vault does nothing to support economic growth. It does not fund new investments, new workers or new products. Without that base of new investment or new spending, prices fall further, goods are discounted more deeply and the deflation spiral worsens.
We could power out of such a spiral by raising inflation expectations. The Fed could promise that any decline in prices today would be met by an equal rise in prices tomorrow. Any business considering sitting on its cash would know that know that this is a losing proposition. What it gains by taking advantage of disinflation today, it will lose when exposed to re-inflation tomorrow.
Making this plan work, however, requires that the Fed be willing to produce catch-up inflation -- a short period in which inflation would be higher than normal, so as to make up for the current period were inflation is lower than normal.
At a talk this weekend, Bernanke, however, "rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy."
That is, he has rejected the idea of catch up inflation. He has rejected using the Fed to power out of the spiral. He has decided to let it happen here.
We can only hope that time will bring back the Bernanke of yore.
Karl Smith is an assistant professor of economics and government at the University of North Carolina and a blogger at ModeledBehavior.com.
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
Corporate cash does funny things to people. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) got into office by pledging to fight "special interests," but just a decade or so later, he's running one of the biggest special interest shows in Washington. It's easy to see the appeal. As the fancy funding backing the Tea Party demonstrates, big money buys big things—from elections to populist outrage.
In a piece for Mother Jones, Kate Sheppard details some of DeMint's serious campaign finance flip-floppery. During his first bid for Congress in 1998, DeMint denounced the Political Action Committee (PAC) mechanism as a tool deployed by "special interests" that "corrupts" the electoral process. But today, DeMint is the single most important figure and fundraiser for Senate Tea Party races. He has endorsed and pledged millions of dollars to support fringe right-wingers Senate candidates Christine O'Donnell (Delaware) and Rand Paul (Kentucky). DeMint has funneled this money through his own Political Action Committee (PAC) known as the Senate Conservatives Fund. DeMint even pledged to "fight for reforms that allow only individual contributions to campaigns."
But as I note in a blog for Campaign for America's Future, DeMint isn't the only power player pouring money into the Tea Party. DeMint's 12 Tea Party Senate candidates have reaped over $4.6 million from Wall Street for this election—excluding Wall Street cash that has been funneled through DeMint's PAC. So much for all that grassroots rage against bailed-out elites.
The Tea Party bubble
And Wall Street's new Tea Party investment might just be the next big economic bubble. Joshua Holland at AlterNet surveys the campaign contributions of America's bailout barons. The 23 firms that received at least $1 billion in bailout money from taxpayers spent $1.4 million on campaign contributions—in September alone.
And these are just campaign contributions, which are essentially unaffected by the high court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The real corporate money is running through front-groups that run their own ads—not the official campaigns operated by political candidates. And these front-groups don't have to disclose where their money comes from.
Writing for Campus Progress, Simeon Tally highlights a frightening trend toward secrecy in U.S. elections, fueled by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. Back in 2004, 98 percent of outside groups disclosed who their donors were. Today, that number is just 32 percent. We're not just fighting corporate money bombs, we're fighting secret corporate money bombs.
Who really has the advantage?
While there's been much debate over who really comes out on top thanks to the post-Citizens United rules, Jesse Zwick notes for The Washington Independent, these stories are only talking about direct campaign contributions. Some might argue that Democrats have an advantage in disclosed funding, but Republicans have a six-to-one advantage money flowing through outside groups.
But wait, there's more!
- Check out Matthew Reichbach and Trip Jennings' reporting for The New Mexico Independent on the fact that all of this spending from outside groups usually means money from outside the states where candidates are running. Outside expenditures have swelled to $5 million in two New Mexico House races—both in relatively cheap media markets.
- AlterNet has been running loads of stories on crooked corporate cash, covering everything from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's dirty dealings with AIG to the political spending habits of bailed-out banks. Joshua Holland rounds up eight of the articles here for AlterNet.
- Comic artist Matt Bors makes light of America's new "growth industries" at Campus Progress, pointing to makers of anonymous political attack ads.
In 2001, Ben Bernanke earned the nickname Helicopter Ben, after a talk he gave at the National Economists Club. The title of the talk was “Deflation: Making Sure ‘It’ Doesn't Happen Here,” a reference to the spiral of disinflation, leading to economic stagnation, leading to outright deflation, that gripped Japan for over a decade after the collapse of its real estate and stock bubbles.
Bernanke, then a Federal Reserve governor – now its chairman – argued that this spiral of economic destruction could be prevented in the United States:
Virtually all economists agree that disinflation and deflation are caused by a shortage of dollars in the economy. The majority agree that such deflation is accompanied by a rise in unemployment. If inflation is too many dollars chasing too few goods, then deflation is too few dollars chasing too few goods. As a side effect some of those goods are never caught. No one buys them, their producers lay off workers and unemployment rises.The U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost.
But, Bernake said, we need not let it happen here. The problem is – we are.
The economy is contracting, inflation is falling, wages are stagnant and we are dangerously close to outright deflation. The spiral has come home to America.
Intimidated by inflation hawks, however, Ben Bernanke said, “I have rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy.”
That’s true Fed speak, so let me see if I can parse it out for you.
The economy is being dragged down by the spiral of ever lower inflation. As banks and businesses see inflation fall, it only increases their incentive to sit on the cash they have. As I mentioned before, if we reach outright deflation then they can earn a profit simply by stockpiling money in vault. Every year as prices fall the money locked in that vault would become more and more valuable.
However, money locked in a vault does nothing to support economic growth. It does not fund new investments, new workers or new products. Without that base of new investment or new spending, prices fall further, goods are discounted more deeply and the deflation spiral worsens.
We could power out of such a spiral by raising inflation expectations. The Fed could promise that any decline in prices today would be met by an equal rise in prices tomorrow. Any business considering sitting on its cash would know that know that this is a losing proposition. What it gains by taking advantage of disinflation today, it will lose when exposed to re-inflation tomorrow.
Making this plan work, however, requires that the Fed be willing to produce catch-up inflation -- a short period in which inflation would be higher than normal, so as to make up for the current period were inflation is lower than normal.
At a talk this weekend, Bernanke, however, "rejected any notion that we are going to try to raise inflation to a super-normal level in order to have effects on the economy."
That is, he has rejected the idea of catch up inflation. He has rejected using the Fed to power out of the spiral. He has decided to let it happen here.
We can only hope that time will bring back the Bernanke of yore.
Karl Smith is an assistant professor of economics and government at the University of North Carolina and a blogger at ModeledBehavior.com.
eric seiger
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
There are many benefits to starting an online blog. People from all walks of life can become writers and share their varied points of view. From that point on, writers can use a blog to become successful in a variety of topics. Whether they blog about wider topics such as celebrities, or interior design; or they blog about a single, specific medical condition, and so forth: a blog is a great way to attract a specific crowd of readers, make money, or even add to a resume.
Writing Online for Money
One of the more attractive reasons for online blogging is the potential cash that a person could bring in. There are no ways to gain revenue from an online blog through companies such as Google, who offer programs that pay websites (not just blogs,) a small portion of the revenue earned through their advertising. However, guidelines must be followed - such as not clicking on your own links, and not encouraging others to do so.
It should be noted that very few people are successful enough to bring in enough revenue on a single blog. Blogging, as with many other forms of online publication, is not a "quick cash cow."
That being said, in most cases the revenue takes a while to build up and is often significantly smaller than what a person may have expected. This is why many professional online freelance writers recommend that you "don't put all of your eggs in one basket." By writing for several different online websites, or running several blogs - it is easier to reach monetary goals rather than expecting it to come easily from one place.
Benefits of a Blog for Resumes
Surprisingly, a successful blog can also be used on a resume. For example, if you're seeking a job as a writer for a financial magazine, and you have even a small following on a blog - show it off. The blog is a great way to let your potential employer know that you're serious about the job, and that you can attract the readers they're looking for.
Negative Aspects for Online Writing
Unfortunately, there is no form of true "internet police." An online writer will soon discover that their hard work has been stolen and reproduced on another blog, likely one with an automatic feed. This is often frustrating, so it's important to monitor your online library through Google Alerts. Google Alerts will email you every time a specific phrase you've entered, comes up in their search engines.
Overall, making money online is no simple task. There are thousands upon thousands of scams online that suggest quick, easy money with little to no work. However, the real world carries over from the online world - money and status must be worked for, they will not magically appear overnight.
Source:
Personal Experience
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
Cee-Lo Green sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' on 'Colbert Report' - The Dish Rag <b>...</b>
With William Shatner and possibly Gwyneth Paltrow taking a stab at “F*** You,” Cee-Lo Green shows them how it's done.The musician appears on Comedy Central's...
<b>News</b> Poll FAIL - Epic Fail Funny Videos and Funny Pictures
epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. ... News Poll FAIL. epic fail photos - News Poll FAIL. Submitted by: Unknown. Incorrect source or offensive? G-rated, math is too hard, news, News Poll, opinions, poll, television ...
Google <b>News</b> enhanced for mobiles - Pocket-lint
Google News enhanced for mobiles - Easier navigation for your fat fingers.
eric seiger
No comments:
Post a Comment